this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
217 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2247 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia said a battalion of Ukrainian prisoners of war, or POWs, would soon be sent to the front lines to fight against their own country, state media reported.

State media said troops had taken an oath of allegiance, but the move could still be a violation of international laws concerning warfare. It also raises questions about the need to use POWs, in particular about the state and quality of Russia's forces as they suffer a high number of casualties on the battlefield.

On November 7, the Russian state media outlet RIA Novosti said Ukrainian POWs in the "Bogdan Khmelnitsky" battalion swore an oath of allegiance to Russia and would soon deploy into battle. The outlet had said in late October that Russian authorities were planning to send the group — described as a battalion including about 70 prisoners from various penal colonies — to the front lines and that they were conducting relevant training in preparation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What's going to stop them from just surrendering to whoever they're fighting?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Same thing they do to Russian troops, they'll shoot anyone that tries.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Curious how that will work out in an actual combat scenario.

Is there just a direct line of sight to would-be defectors at all times? Seems like in the heat of battle, it would be pretty difficult for Russians to fight their own soldiers as well as Ukraine's.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's the power of organizational knowledge

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, there is a chance they'll miss as there are hundreds of russians caught by the Ukrainians. Lets hope they liberate their country men.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Best case, the POWs and Ukrainian Forces both have a clear understanding of surrender procedurals.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

The fact that they won’t be “fighting” fighting…

More likely, they’ll be told to blindly run towards hidden Ukrainian positions to help expose them. All while being shot at by russians behind them. It’s disgusting, the thought of being forced into friendly fire for tactical gain…

A weird symmetry with the tales about russian squads that are singularly tasked with shooting any russian that retreats…

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

They will most likely be used to attract javelin missiles in barely working vehicles while flanked by tanks or they will find anti infantry mines the hard way. There is no escape except death.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most likely being executed by higher ups.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They could also kill those higher-ups first. I'm not sure why the Russians think giving them guns will work out well for them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A Russian battalion has 900 men. The article stated that there were only about 70 POW's. Basically they are surrounded by Russian soldiers so even with weapons they would only be able to take out a few people around them before being killed themselves.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If they're being sent to die anyway, why not take out people around them?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

It's easy to say that when you aren't the one dying

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Because escaping and living is still the best option.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They might convince their squad mates to defect and surrender.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Most likely scenario.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Russians don't always give their soldiers guns.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Everybody sleeps, everybody bleeds.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In the real world it is a lot harder for people being threatened by violence to risk their lives for a positive group outcome than it seems to those of us sitting in our chairs in no direct danger.

Most people don't want to be the one who dies trying for the positive group outcome.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago