Asklemmy

46003 readers

1395 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What is still considered a rivalry, even though it's mostly one-sided? (kbin.melroy.org)

submitted 23 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't have any good examples that I know of, but I am very curious. To me though, a rivalry is a rivalry when two or more of people are closely competitive. But is it really a rivalry anymore when someone has more victories over the other? I don't think so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The only thing one-sided about the Chiefs are the refs' calls.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Spoken like someone who hasn't actually looked at the stats for accepted penalties in the NFL. If you had, you'd know the Bills and Vikings are actually getting much more help than the Chiefs.

But that's okay.

You can be wrong. :) The rest of us know your team sucks of their own accord.