this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
952 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

64075 readers
5523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 66 points 20 hours ago (21 children)

Basically declaring that they don't allow free speech.

"Hey, you have been liking things we disagree with and we need an echo chamber here, align with us or fuck off. Sincerely, the money hungry bitches of the internet! Also heil daddy musk!"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

Basically declaring that they don’t allow free speech.

It's a privately owned platform. You never have an assurance of free speech on any of those, and on Reddit, the rot set in years ago.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I have a strange opinion, but here goes: The Right to Free Speech (Im in the US here), should protect you from censorship. Doing what Reddit is doing should be considered a Rights violation and we should be able to sue them into the ground.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Terrible idea. Any site that bans for hate speech would also be a rights violation. If a platform doesn't share your values, leave it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, sadly, freedom of speech includes freedom of hate speech. The platform would have to rely on its users downvoting or ridiculing the offender rather than outright bans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

See Twitter to see what "free speech absolutism" gets you. The hateful stuff will quickly overrun and take over the platform, chasing decent people away.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Twitter isn't even remotely pro-free-speech; much like Reddit, they claim to be in order to defend the worst people on the platform, while routinely deleting or banning people for speech they disagree with

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

That's correct. But it starts by allowing hate speech. Can you give an example of a single platform that allows it that didn't become a toxic shithole?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Well, you are certainly entitled to that opinion even though it's wrong, and I do think banning you for it is also wrong.

There's a big difference between having ideas and taking actions. Ideas cannot be allowed to become illegal. Even disgusting ones.

The correct response to unconscionable ideas is social, not institutional.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)