this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
125 points (99.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

58215 readers
276 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A single DMCA anti-circumvention notice, sent by Nintendo on the one-year anniversary of its 2024 lawsuit against Yuzu, showed just how much things can change in a year. Targeting nine repos linked to Switch emulator Ryujinx, the domino effect led to the removal of 4,238 repos. Elsewhere, the distilled components of Yuzu's demise can be found in recent takedown notices

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (6 children)

P2P code repo when? Git needs to die in 2025

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Git was made to work decentralized and repositories are trivial to mirror.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 days ago

Git is significantly better than the alternatives. Don't conflate git and GitHub, they're entirely different.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago

do you mean github or do you actually mean git?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Isn't git technically already P2P? Everyone has the complete repo, and everyone can pull from everyone else, as long as a connection can be established. The networking/organization of this is just not automatic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Yes, this maximal decentralized usage where everybody has their own copy but can collaborate and pick and choose from other copies was a central idea in the creation of git. Ultimately it was made for Linux Kernel development and that is how that works over there.

You do not even need to use git specific protocols. One can simply import patch sets and mail them to each other.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

https://git-annex.branchable.com/todo/Bittorrent-like_features/ -- Use IPFS as a special git-annex remote, and it will be nearly impossible to execute a take-down.

If you have other "decentralized filesystems" that have "better" behavior than IPFS, you might see if joeyh or yourself can add them as other special remotes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

There is also Radicle that is building a darkgit with p2p distributed design

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm not sure how I like at protocol being the thing that makes this happen, but I'm glad others are working on the issue! Maybe I'll change my mind later but it's still to close to a million dollar company for my taste