this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
308 points (96.4% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2479 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Friday gave one of his most direct condemnations of the civilian death toll in Gaza and said more needs to be done to “minimize harm to Palestinian civilians.”

Although Blinken commended Israel for its announcement of daily military pauses in areas of Northern Gaza and two evacuation corridors, he said that “there is more that can and should be done to minimize harm to Palestinian civilians.”

The top US diplomat has subtly shifted his messaging in the days since he departed the Middle East earlier this week to more directly voice condemnation of the civilian toll in Gaza and the US’ expectations for the Israeli government. However, he still has not condemned the Israeli government offensive and has continually voiced support for its right to defend itself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they'd only defend towards Hamas. But now the world knows it's not the case.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If they’d only defend towards Hamas. But now the world knows it’s not the case.

Huh? That's a bit garbled. Are you suggesting they aren't attacking Hamas, the government of Gaza? Are you suggesting they intentionally let the October 7th attack happen? Neither of these make sense to me and I'd like to see some supporting evidence if that's what you're getting at. Vague phrases like, "the world knows," are empirically useless, like supporting a claim with, "people say."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't know where you pulled your assumptions. The whole topic is about civilian casualties. Defense would be fighting Hamas but now it's clear that the attacks are towards others as well.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Defense would be fighting Hamas but now it’s clear that the attacks are towards others as well.

You're now making a claim about intended targets, high civilian casualties is not proof that they intentionally target civilians. Citation, please.

Defense is when Israel takes action to neutralize the threat against them that just killed hundreds of its people. High collateral damage doesn't make it not defense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

With the current statistics, the collateral damage seems to be higher than the assumed real targets. Does not fit into my values any way you try to bend it, sorry not sorry.