Asklemmy

43414 readers

1530 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Weirdest thing you use / you've seen used for decoration? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I use a menu of a restaurant like a poster. I haven't ordered from them. It's a simple large burger menu.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

they are specific to humans, though fur does help to hide (heh, get it) a lot, so it wouldn't surprise me for there to be extra challenge to a pig. in addition to the lack of fur though, humans also have very thin skin, which tears easily.

furthermore, if you're taxidermizing a human, you would generally want the end product to look like that person. most of what makes a human look like themself is not the skin. it's the bones and muscles and fat in the face, and the perceptions of living humans are incredibly sensitive to subtle variations in those features. to have any hope of recognizability, you would probably need an extremely detailed sculpture of the subject's head to be made ahead of time to be used as the form. at that point you really might as well just use the sculpture to commemorate the person, rather than wrapping their skin around it at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

fur does help to hide (heh, get it) a lot

🥁

Pretty much what I suspected about "naked" skin vs fur, which just intuitively seems way more "forgiving."

most of what makes a human look like themself is not the skin. it’s the bones and muscles and fat in the face, and the perceptions of living humans are incredibly sensitive to subtle variations in those features.

Ohhh this makes complete sense now that you say it; we're incredibly well tuned for recognizing faces, so I guess not only would it be hard to make the person recognizable, but it might also be hard to not have imperfections in the face that give everyone an "uncanny valley" sort of feeling that something's off about it?

I can definitely say that the problems with taxidermizing humans was definitely not something I expected to learn about today (or necessarily ever really), so thank you for taking the time to explain all that. It was honestly interesting to learn about something that I had absolutely no knowledge of beforehand.

If you don't mind me asking, do you know this stuff via actually doing taxidermy, or are you just another infinitely curious person?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

but it might also be hard to not have imperfections in the face that give everyone an "uncanny valley" sort of feeling that something's off about it?

yep, precisely so.

do you know this stuff via actually doing taxidermy, or are you just another infinitely curious person?

the latter, i suppose. i've had a fascination with the history of sideshows, professional freaks, medical anomalies, and the like since i was a wee lass, and attempts at taxidermizing humans come up somewhat often in that course of study.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Oh neat. That definitely qualifies under infinite curiosity.