this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
851 points (99.4% liked)

PC Gaming

9560 readers
1142 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I did not realize they were trying to compete in the first place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could you link a screenshot of the LinkedIn post? I don't want to make a LinkedIn account.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As VP of Prime Gaming at Amazon, we failed multiple times to disrupt the game platform Steam. We were at least 250x bigger, and we tried everything. But ultimately, Goliath lost. Here's why:

The 15+ year long attempt to challenge Steam started before I was VP of Prime Gaming, but we never cracked the code. Not under my leadership or anyone else's.

The first way we tried to enter the online-game-store market was through acquisition. We acquired Reflexive Entertainment (a small PC game store) and tried to scale it. It went nowhere.

Then, after buying Twitch, we created our own PC games store. Our assumption was that gamers would naturally buy from us because they were already using Twitch. Wrong.

Finally, we built "Luna," a game streaming service that let people play without a high-end PC. Around the same time, Google tried the same thing with their product "Stadia." Neither gained significant traction. The whole time, Steam dominated despite being a relatively small company (compared to Amazon and Google).

The mistake was that we underestimated what made consumers use Steam.

It was a store, a social network, a library, and a trophy case all in one. And it worked well.

At Amazon, we assumed that size and visibility would be enough to attract customers, but we underestimated the power of existing user habits. We never validated our core assumptions before investing heavily in solutions. The truth is that gamers already had the solution to their problems, and they weren't going to switch platforms just because a new one was available.

We needed to build something dramatically better, but we failed to do so. And we needed to validate our assumptions about our customers before starting to build. But we never really did that either.

Just because you are big enough to build something doesn’t mean people will use it.

Reflecting on these mistakes, I realize how crucial it is to deeply understand customers before making big moves. That’s why James Birchler’s guest newsletter caught my attention—his piece is a practical guide on obtaining real customer insights and using them to challenge entrenched assumptions that can hurt product success.

James breaks his advice down into three key steps, illustrated with stories from his time as VP of Engineering at IMVU:

  1. Talk to Real Customers Before Writing Code
  2. Test Assumptions, Not Just Features
  3. Build Measurement Into Your Process

After explaining how he learned these lessons the hard way (getting screamed at by customers and board members), James shares action items you can implement within a week to improve how you understand your customers.

I wish Amazon had followed James’ playbook before trying to take on Steam. But since we didn’t, at least you can.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At Amazon, we assumed that size and visibility would be enough to attract customers

Literally "we're big so we'll make money" with no thought on the product actually being offered.

Hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

"But we acquired a successful franchise! All we have to do is attach a handle to it and crank it and the money will come flying out!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is such lukewarm obvious stuff to anyone who's done any agile project management that it's mind-boggling they would fail to do it.

But I guess it's what happens when decision are made by bean counters with absolute authority.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

It's corporate arrogance. "We are so big we can take that market" without understanding what built that market. They think business is numbers but it is about relationships with people.