this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
295 points (96.8% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3954 readers
291 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 76 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I believe that is 381 km squared, not 381 square kilometers. Vastly different areas. Germany is much larger than 381 square kilometers.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

Oops. You are correct. Thank you. Fixing.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

If it's a square 381km x 381km then that's 145161km² (and I'm not aware that there's any difference between "square kilometres" and "kilometres squared", is there?)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Square x and x squared is the same thing. The proper way to say this is "A square of 381 km width"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

It's very common to use km^2 (or m^2 or whatever) as a unit of area, with the understanding that a square with x km sides has area x^2 km^2. I can see what you're saying, but I think most people would call that area 'over 145 000 square km' or something, rather than talk about the side length.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

In writing it's not clear, but in spoken word you usually stress it like (381 kilometers) *pause* squared, which makes it clear the square applies to both value and unit, (381km)², whereas 381 (kilometers squared) is just 381km²

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

The title still looks wrong to me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Probably should take this post down, since it’s misleading.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago

381^2^ k^2^m^2^