Privacy

31998 readers

702 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

243

EU unveils ‘revolutionary’ laws to curb big tech firms’ power (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Haven't seen any posts about this and it's a pretty big thing. From DMA website:

Examples of the “do’s”: gatekeepers will for example have to:

allow third parties to inter-operate with the gatekeeper’s own services in certain specific situations;
provide companies advertising on their platform with the tools and information necessary for advertisers and publishers to carry out their own independent verification of their advertisements hosted by the gatekeeper;
allow their business users to promote their offer and conclude contracts with their customers outside the gatekeeper’s platform.

Example of the “don'ts”: gatekeepers will for example no longer:

treat services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself more favourably in ranking than similar services or products offered by third parties on the gatekeeper's platform;
prevent users from un-installing any pre-installed software or app if they wish so;
track end users outside of the gatekeepers' core platform service for the purpose of targeted advertising, without effective consent having been granted.

We'll see how this plays out but this is first move in a very long time that could open up platform like WhatsApp to 3rd party clients and force Google and Apple to open their mobile OSes to other apps. Maybe we'll see stock Android without play services? One can dream...

P.S. https://digital-markets-act-cases.ec.europa.eu - page about the legislation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Legal cookie banners need to make consent as easy as nonconsent.

So, if "Accept All" is a button, "Deny All" also needs to be a button.
Also, you cannot refuse service to someone who refuses Cookies, unless they're necessary to the functioning of the service.

Without these principles, it wouldn't be consent. You can't force someone to give consent.

You also do not need a Cookie banner, if:

you don't track personal data. (GDPR literally does not apply.)
you only track personal data obviously required for the provided service, like a login cookie or a shopping cart cookie. (Implied Consent)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Google got the shit fined out of them for not doing this