Privacy

33339 readers

943 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Is your threat level not always the state level? (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If you are living in a country that is not save and free from politically motivated prosecution or other dangerous pursuits, all activities, messages and so on, that are critical of that country could be seen as dangerous to said system and therefore illegal. So making them public puts you in great danger. By “public” I don’t mean publicly available, but readable for state actors.

If you are living in a currently safe system, the internet does not forget things. So when it flips to an unsafe country, all your previously save thoughts, messages and so on are now illegal and are already out in the net. That puts you in great danger if you ever in your past had interactions which are now seen as illegal. And you can never know which topics could be illegal or dangerous by then.

Another example would be traveling to unsafe states that you were ever critical of.

All of those (and possibly more) scenarios are dangerous for you as the actor, but for any family member of yours in the future (or past) as well.

So would it not always be in your interest to hide as much as possible, not just depending on your current situation or the assumed threat level? I have a hard time wrapping my head around statements like securing oneself depending on one’s threat level.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

What you're doing is saying, "What if things get worse?" To which I say, "What if they get better?"

Saying "it is possible, so it is therefore likely" is an appeal to probability, a logical fallacy; we don't know what the future holds, and so while you might win in terms of privacy with either outcome, there's always a tradeoff between security and useability. Additionally, few enjoy living in a state of constant paranoia.

Some people can be reasonably certain that being targeted by the government(s) is a low threat. Others cannot. That's why threat models should be assessed on an individual basis. Are you white, cis, and male? Probably a low priority target overall. Do you engage in piracy? High priority for ultracapitalists but low for religiously motivated actors, so what kind of government do you have?

In every case, you will be giving up something, like the ability to connect with as many people, the ability to use networks without obfuscation, the ability to go out in public without a disguise, etc. It's everyone's right to have privacy, but not everyone is required to exercise that right in the same way.

The best we can hope for is that everyone is able to make informed decisions, so they can decide if they want to accept certain risks and aren't surprised should negative consequences befall them.