this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
1121 points (99.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12985 readers
1135 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes and no. American companies have been following OpenAI's strategy, which is simply scaling up as quickly as possible. From massive data centers swallowing our drinking water for coolant to coal and natural gas power plants to keep it running, it's been all about pouring as much money and resources as possible in order to scale up to improve their models.

What DeepSeek has done is prove that that's the wrong way to go about it, and now suddenly, all these companies that have been a massive money sink without any clear path to profitability already have to completely pivot their strategy. Most will probably die before they can. Investors are already selling off their stock.

So AI will become closer to actually being practical/profitable, but I imagine most of the companies who reach that goal won't be the companies that exist today, and the AI bubble itself will probably collapse from this pivot, if we're lucky.

Since DeepSeek is also open source, we might even see free competitors that can be run locally pop up that can go toe to toe with the likes of ChatGPT, which would be a real stake through the heart for these massive companies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

I wouldn't consider DeepSeek open source. A few weeks ago when it would discuss this subject freely with me (it doesn't anymore), it described keeping some of the most important parts private but the rest being open source. It's not really open source if it's only partial because you can't reproduce it yourself in the same way.

Someone suggested the term 'open weight' might be a more honest term. "Open source" has really caught on though.