395
'Went nuclear': State Department reportedly 'shocked' as Rubio freezes foreign aid
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
395 points (99.7% liked)
politics
19594 readers
3806 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I was told the genocide was going to stop.
The Trump plan to end genocide is to hurry up and get it over with.
Yes they are going to end all the wars by killing all Palestinians and Ukrainians. They were very clear on that.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/26/trump-resumes-sending-2000-pound-bombs-to-israel-undoing-biden-pause
If someone claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they’re lying.
I have to say it so often it's in my profile. I don't believe I've ever been wrong.
I'm not going to provide a link, because half of the tankieverse was saying anyone voting Harris is voting genocide and you fucking know it. I of course was banned from the hexbear memes community of all places for suggesting that Trump IS going to be worse and that they all know it but don't care because Trump is the more authoritarian, more pro-Putin choice.
Moving the goalposts. You don't need to show that someone said, "Voting Harris is voting genocide" you need to find me someone who said, "If Trump wins, the genocide will stop," which is the claim that was actually made by the person I replied to. Please refrain from that sort of rhetorical trickery.
Rhetorical trickery or hyperbole?
Anyway, okay, I'll move the goalposts exactly to where they should be set:
There may or may not have been individuals claiming Trump's better. I know there were, but nobody's going to pay me what my time's worth to look up 3 month old posts. So let's say there weren't. But there were a LOT of people saying that voting for Harris = voting for genocide, which in a two party system implies that you SHOULDN'T vote for Harris, which is functionally the same as voting for Trump.
There were a lot of people using the whole genocide thing to help Trump win the election, they just weren't mostly claiming Trump would stop it, they sorta... implied it very indirectly.
Hyperbole is a form or rhetorical trickery.
Nothing else you said is relevant. I commented to point out a lie, or "hyperbole" if you want to call it that. If you want to debate something unrelated to that "hyperbole," bring it up somewhere where it doesn't serve as a deflection from a legitimate call-out.
If you take this position of, "Using hyperbole to exaggerate the other side's position to make it easier to attack is perfectly fine," it doesn't exactly give me confidence that you're going to engage in anything resembling good faith. This sort of attitude is unfortunately pervasive around here, which is why I have to use that first line so frequently.
Aren't you that tankie guy?