this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
609 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19693 readers
3657 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde, Episcopal bishop at the Washington National Cathedral, directly confronted Donald Trump during his inaugural prayer service, urging him to show compassion for marginalized groups.

She criticized his policies on LGBTQ rights, mass deportations, and immigration, calling for mercy toward undocumented immigrants and children fearing family separation.

Trump dismissed the sermon as "not too exciting," while his supporters condemned Budde’s remarks as inappropriate.

Budde’s bold address marked the first public challenge to Trump’s agenda during his second term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 266 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

They are exactly appropriate. When the Reverend is calling you out, you're supposed to fucking listen. These dudes are all about hierarchies and traditions until it doesnt suit them.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I think it is a big step forward that the president of an enlightened state no longer places the authority of the church above his own.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How do we reconcile that with Trump's ambassador arguing that Israel has a "biblical right" to the West Bank? There's no consistency of principle here, except for the principle of "whatever suits us".

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/1/21/trumps-un-ambassador-pick-says-israel-has-biblical-right-to-west-bank

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago

It reconciles because they're fascists. A core tenet of the ideology is being contradictory whenever it suits you

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Except he panders to the church as it suits him.

Shoving protest crowds aside so you can awkwardly take a picture with a Bible in front of a church.

Claiming Israel has a divine right to Palestinian land.

But discards the significance and teachings of the church as it suits him. Shouldn't have it both ways.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I know the priest of the church he does photo ops at outside of Mar A Lago. Trump never attends church.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Doesn't Trump get his authority directly from god though, as our god emperor?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Trump gets his power from eating obscene amounts of preservatives to ensure that he never dies... Or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I hope he does not.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Ngl I kinda want to throw this in the faces of the fundie branch of my extended family