Asklemmy

44428 readers

1804 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

How do you think independently? (leminal.space)

submitted 17 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I mean, we all hear about people thinking what they think only because the people around them think it too. So how do you avoid doing that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

There is no such thing a "independent thinking" our thoughts are given form by language and vocabulary. The only independent thinker would be someone completely alienated from society at large.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

You reminded me of something I think no one has mentioned yet:

In philosophy and rhetoric, the principle of charity or charitable interpretation requires interpreting a speaker's statements in the most rational way possible and, in the case of any argument, considering its best, strongest possible interpretation. In its narrowest sense, the goal of this methodological principle is to avoid attributing irrationality, logical fallacies, or falsehoods to the others' statements, when a coherent, rational interpretation of the statements is available.

From: Principle of charity.

Applying this, I think we can interpret the *independent thinking" not as thinking without conditioning factors but as what is known as "critical thinking".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

our thoughts are given form by language and vocabulary

And our experiences, and our intelligence, too. Right?

Which makes the challenge one of navigating that mess.