Selfhosted

41009 readers

499 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Seagate Ironwolf or WD red plus drives (pawb.social)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ive been wanting to get proper storage for my lil server running nextcloud and a couple other things, but nc is the main concern. Its currently running on an old ssd ive had laying around so i would want a more reliable longer term solution.

So thinking of a raid1 (mirror) hdd setup, with two 5400rpm 8tb drives, bringing the choices down to ironwolf or wd red plus, which both are in the same price range.

Im currently biased towards the ironwolfs because they are slightly cheaper and have a cool print on them, but from reddit threads ive seen that wd drives are generally quieter, which currently is a concern since the server is in my bedroom.

Does anyone have experience with these two drives and or know better solutions?

Oh and for the os, being a simple linux server, is it generally fine to have that on a separate drive, an ssd in this case?

Thanks! :3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Look, there's 2 things here:

NAS - meaning storage

and

NAS - meaning a virtualisation / container server that's doing lots of fairly random disk access

Which are you wanting?

For the first, just consider capacity (you'll fill it) and noise (spinning away all night)

For the 2nd, really really consider SSDs as they're silent and fast.

RAID1 is just a convenience factor, so whatever you do, don't get too caught up in the drive mechanics as you'll have a full backup (right?) and can restore your data at a moment's notice.

Honestly, honestly, just go for something large & quiet and you'll be fine.

And yes, SSD for the OS

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So it will be the latter, as it will run nextcloud, a couple websites i have, a pihole and possible game servers when the need comes again. For the websites i plan on using the mass storage as a backup to the sites' data, so the actual running files will stay on the ssd running the os, currently considering proxmox actually.

for nextcloud i am not sure, since i use it to sync, and 'backup' (i know its not meant as a backup program), so it would need lots of random r/w, but it cant fit on the os ssd as that would get too large, currently only have a 250gb ssd on hand for the os.

Id love to get ssds instead of mass storage hdds, but theyre simply 3 times as expensive for the same storage which is out of budget for me.

load more comments (2 replies)