this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
861 points (98.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6212 readers
2804 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean the title question would be super illegal. The thing he did is probably fine if its in a bag and especially fine if he didnt hit anyone with it.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It probably could constitute assault, even without hitting someone

[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'd say about the same level of assault than the christians gathering to call other people murderers.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago

It's too bad the 'powers that be' will probably get really mad something was thrown near their sister or something

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, "they deserved it" isn't really part of the law.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I propose we pass a law that officially makes "he needed killin' " a legally admissible affirmative defense. If you can prove to the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that someone just needed killin', you can't be convicted of murder.

I'm sure this won't have any horrific negative side effects whatsoever...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well tbf cops already do that and it's going as well as you expect it to

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Nah cops don't need to justify their murders to get away with them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Don't be so sure about that, consider that raw chicken will be a good carrier for diseases. On the other hand, if those christians aren't vaccinated they would also qualify for this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's biological material too which often has legal implications.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Throwing something at a person is battery, pretty much everywhere in the US.

You could also make an argument that it's "discharging bodily fluids" or some weird kind of "disturbing the peace" type of offense predicated just on disturbing other people around you, but it definitely would be battery.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

What if you throw a car battery at someone? Is that double battery?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

That's a AA battery

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Only if the battery is charged

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Are they discharged if it's not?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Infinite battery glitch found. Time to plug them into my controller.