this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
27 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

8298 readers
174 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Unix was paid (at least for source code), Linux was free and Mac was easy to use. Any questions?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Well, that is not entierly accurate...

Yes, Unix was paid, but companies didn't switch to Linux, they switched to Windows.

So the cost of Linux doesn't have anything to do with this.

The reason why Unix workstations died was that Windows became good enough and PCs we getting good enough.

Windows PCs were cheaper than Unix workstations, and if they are good enough then there is no reason for a company to pick something else.

Then we have the last nail in the coffin, Itanium.

Itanium was supposed to be the future, Intel marketed it hard enough that companies that had previously developed their own CPUs decided to switch to Itanium and stopped developing their own CPUs.

Then when Itanium proved to be a crap shoot, they had nowhere to go.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I didn't mention Windows because I don't remember any serious workstations using it. PCs did become good enough but it still wasn't the professional workstation level. Though if we're talking about computing in general, Windows has been the king ever since 95 or even 3.0.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

I worked on HP Unix systems, SGI Iris etc: Running CAD on then till around '96 by then the big CAD players had ported to Windows NT and everything got switched to a PC. Because by then PCs had caught up and were much cheaper than running the Unix software and hardware

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

I worked in local government that used Unix workstations for GIS (Graphic Information Systems) - mapping of the local government's property boundaries and many other layers. The DB was held on a DEC Alpha, and it was all very pricey, albeit very good at its job. ESRI ARCGIS, etc

When the time came to replace, they moved it all to Windows. The workstations were beefed-up PCs running NT4.0 and the DB was on a server with NT 4.0 server. DEC was gone by then, absorbed into Compaq, Alphas were discontinued, and no-one wanted to migrate to SUN or HP.