this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
836 points (97.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21601 readers
355 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 111 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    The cool kids are forcing people to read this at gunpoint nowadays

    [–] [email protected] 69 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    Right? It's in the kernel and everything now. Linus likes it. Linus hates everything. HOW MUCH ARE THEY PAYING HIM?

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

    I'm pretty sure Linus dissed on RUST, but then again he disses on everything and everyone.

    [–] [email protected] 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

    Not the L man!

    [–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago

    Did he actually say that he likes it? My impression was that it's not his comfort zone, but he recognizes that for the vast majority of young programmers, C is not their comfort zone. And so, if they don't hop on this Rust train, the Linux kernel is going to look like a COBOL project in a not too distant future. It does not happen very often that a programming language capable of implementing kernels gains wide-spread adoption.

    [–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

    One (1) good programming language is what they paid him XD

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    I'll never touch Rust.

    I hate the syntax and cargo too much for that. If that means that I'll never write mission critical, low level code, so be it.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    What don't you like about Cargo? Is there another package manager you like more?

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    Well - of course I prefer a centralized package manager like pacman, which I also use for python packages etc., but I mainly dislike the building process of rust, which is usually done with cargo. No libraries, not even a global cache for already compiled dependencies, no distcc. This makes it infinitely slower than most C/C++ projects. Compiling the kernel is literally faster than compiling a "simple" project like spotify_cli (500+ dependencies, depending on configuration).

    So it's ass from a user perspective, waiting for stuff to compile (just for it to fail, and start from scratch, as some stuff needs a clean build/src dir), and imo very weird from a dev perspective.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    Why is there Gleam and Deno on the cover?

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    I know you're joking, but uh, both of those are (largely) implemented in Rust...

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

    Cool, I didn’t know that!

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    I like Go better

    However, C is still king in a lot of ways

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    C is definitely still king, but I wonder if crABI will eventually be able to dethrone it:

    https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111423

    If they can define a useful ABI that manages to include lifetimes, that might just be enough of an improvement to get people to switch over from assuming the C ABI everywhere.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

    Still remains to be seen if a potential rust ABI can avoid becoming a chain to the wall the way the C++ ABI seems to have become. When a lot of C++ers apparently agree with "I'm tired of paying for an ABI stability I'm not using" it's not so clear it would really be a boon to Rust.

    That said no_std appears to be what people go to for the lean Rust.

    And a lot of us are happy not having to juggle shared dependencies, but instead having somewhat fat but self-contained binaries. It's part of the draw of Go too; fat binaries come up as a way to avoid managing e.g. Python dependencies across OS-es. With Rust and Go you can build just one binary per architecture/libc and be done with it.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    The problem is that both Rust and Go are huge. The compiled binaries are bigger and the compilers themselves and slower and more resource intensive. The current benefit to C is that is lean and compiles quickly.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    Rust is only huge because it doesn't have an ABI. If you had an ABI (and didn't have to compile every single dependency into the binary) the binary sizes would probably drop a lot to the point where they're only slightly bigger than a C counterpart

    Edit: I don't know if Go has an ABI but they also include a runtime garbage collector in their binaries so that probably has something to do with it.