Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55056 readers

164 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

258

Judges Acquit a Total of 23 Pirate IPTV Subscribers: Personal Use is Not a Crime (torrentfreak.com)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Italians who simply view pirate IPTV via illicit subscriptions have been warned for months that their activities could be reported to the judicial authorities for potential prosecution. As part of an investigation into a pirate IPTV subscription seller, a total of 23 people have appeared in court in recent months for simply buying a pirate package. Judges in two separate proceedings have now acquitted all 23 after concluding that this type of piracy isn't actually a crime.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That is a fair point though honestly I don't think the end user should be on the hook at all, it should be the people providing the service as they are the ones effectively running counterfeit streaming services.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Agreed, although apparently plenty of governments don't think the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't get it, most of the streaming providers they are protecting are foreign companies, if anything piracy is keeping more money in the local economy so why go so hard on IP laws above and beyond any treaty requirements?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A main driver of this was Mediaset, which is actually Italian. Seriously, the article is right there. I didn't know about it before I read it, either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes but that is still one company which I doubt is a massive contributor to GDP. However upon reading more about it it seems it's linked to Berlusconi so I'm guessing that its a case of corruption with these laws serving to protect personal profits?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Mediaset is a proper multibillion dollar multinational media conglomerate. It is not the one rich guy wanting to protect their investment, any more than Disney dictating the details of US copyright law is. Diney, incidentally, also a player in this conversation.

Lobbying doesn't happen based on percentage of GDP, friend.