this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
537 points (98.2% liked)

World News

32300 readers
410 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Police in the United Kingdom are using data from period tracking apps and mass spectrometry tests conducted on blood, placenta, and urine to investigate patients who have had “unexplained” miscarriages.

Though abortion is legal in the UK, there are TRAP laws in place requiring certain conditions to be met first, paramount of which is that two separate doctors need to agree that the patient meets the criteria of the 1967 Abortion Act before any treatment can go ahead. Self-managed abortion is a criminal offense with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment in the UK, as is any abortion performed after the pregnancy has progressed passed 23 weeks and six days, unless the patient is at risk of serious physical harm or death, or the fetus has severe developmental anomalies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Imagine what life could be like if the people actually faught back against fascism.

But they never, ever do.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But my cage is so comfy and I've just got everything the way I like it.

Seriously though, I am too scared of jail to fight back

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And if you make me scared, I'll call you "paranoid" so I won't have to think about it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Gosh I wonder how fascism keeps managing to take hold

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As an angry mob flooding the police precinct; not as an annoyed mob with signs standing in a designated area after obtaining permits to stand in the designated area with signs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How would we address the prisoner's dilemma of the first person getting shot?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Give up, these types never have any sort of thought to organization, they want to see tmstuff happen, but refuse to apply any effort or thought themselves.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that to imply that you would be willing to lead then?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't have to have a solution to see a problem .

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All revolts have risk. Everyone knows this. A revolutionary does not dwell in them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want a revolution that can succeed because it has a social structure of some kind. Not one that will just kill off our most altruistic allies by unilaterally hurling our bodies at armed thugs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the social structure that fuels radical fascism?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know. Why do you ask?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because their revolution has worked great without any social structure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which revolution was that? Like the Founding Fathers, or January 6th, or the police, or what?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of the radical right wing violence leading to more radical right wing politicians and radical right wing division from society on a local level. Also, the radical right wing threats of violence against political opponents that gives us shitbags like MTG.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But right-wing political parties are a social structure. Voting works better than dying in a hail of bullets, and voting works even better if you've got no qualms with gerrymandering to retain power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe that could have worked for us decades ago? I don't know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where does "dying in a hail of bullets" come into play?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So your police will fire wildly at a crowd of civilians? You have already lost. You are under fascist rule. You will now have to arm yourselves to survive.

In all of these discussions the defense from the left is always "we are weak and pathetic".

The opponent does not think this way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, we should all be armed! That's great for self-defense or an escape.

But for you individually, your odds of survival go down if you attack the police station. If you sit that one out, you can free ride off other people dying to protect you from a common bully.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OR...just become ungovernable. This is how civil wars are actually waged worldwide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh just do that, easy. Bullets bounce off you.

You are LARPing hard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You do not understand anything in my previous sentence, do you? You think it means meeting on a battlefield, don't you?

I am sick of a world full of feckless pussies. I hope it nukes tomorrow.