this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
684 points (99.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6764 readers
503 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Eurofighter Typhoon shenanigans

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

technically this one wasn't actually classified, it's just "NATO restricted" so if you live in a NATO country (or even some allied countries iirc) you can access it freely as if it was declassified, you just can't send it to China or Russia.

Like you can just freely Google that manual or purchase a physical copy without any sort of checks.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That isn't what NATO Restricted means, at least not in the US—I'm not going to attempt to delve into Hungarian law. It falls under the category of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) established by Executive Order 13556, and codified in DoD Instruction 5200.48

This information is not freely available to the public, and must be cleared for release according to the procedures detailed in the aforementioned documents, which specify that it should only be disseminated for official government purposes.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Controlled Unclassified Information

Yeah, so it's not classified.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unclassified is still a classification level and doesn't imply that it is meant for broader dissemination; CUI would need approval to be shared. People like you are why everyone has to suffer through annual training every year.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People like you are why everyone has to suffer through annual training every year.

This hit me hard and now I'm angry. But it explains why I have to speed run sexual harassment and security training every year even though it seems like a capybara would know better than to do the things being warned against.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago

I feel like you're taking this a bit too seriously.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You literally know nothing John snow, and your ignorance is apparent to anyone with even passing experience in this space. I know this because I only have passing experience in this space related to dumbass cyber security rules.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I really don't get why everyone is taking my comment extremely seriously.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh I don't anymore, I just wrote this before I caught up on you being a waste.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Good to hear, remember this is NCD, and you should except people to make jokes and be a bit silly.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's literally what classified means, that it has a classification. That classification is NATO Restricted.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As the other reply mentioned, it's "Controlled Unclassified Information" so it's in the name, unclassified.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not what that means. You've been told what it means.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, and, like my first comment t said, it's technically not classified.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

...technically, it's not not classified, it's unclassified...

...does unclassified require something to have first been classified?..semantically, certainly, but technically i have no idea...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're still wrong and at this point, getting fucking annoying

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sure, whatever, if it means that much to you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That's how we enforce Rule 7. By actually knowing what classified means.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago