this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
239 points (98.8% liked)

News

23627 readers
2947 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Euthanasia accounted for 4.7% of deaths in Canada in 2023, with 15,300 people opting for assisted dying—a 16% increase, though slower than prior years.

Most recipients had terminal illnesses, primarily cancer, and 96% were white, sparking questions about disparities.

Quebec, at 37% of cases, remains Canada's euthanasia hotspot.

Since legalizing assisted dying in 2016, Canada has expanded access, now covering chronic conditions and planning to include mental illnesses by 2027.

Critics, citing rapid growth and controversial cases, warn of insufficient safeguards, while proponents highlight strict eligibility criteria. Debate continues globally.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It’s ridiculous that there is a prerequisite of terminal illness

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There's a huge push from the right that this is unethical to offer it in the first place and that soon we are just going to let people euthanize themselves instead of "treating" them. I mean, i don't want people to do this either, but who are we to force a choice onto someone?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

It makes me worried about vulnerable people getting bullied into it somehow.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep - "unethical" to let people die without suffering and passing on financial ruin to loved ones, but "ethical" to kill criminals for their misdeeds. That's superb logic from the right.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I don’t disagree with you, but I think you’re thinking US not Canada. Death penalty is not Canadian. I don’t think? And health cares free (not to say there’s not other costs associated).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

We haven't had the death penalty for decades. We stopped using it in '63 and officially abolished in '76 for civilians and '99 for things like treason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Yes - US perspective. Whacky world view, IMO.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They love to control you. And if people had a super easy way to check out, they would lose a lot of their workforce.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that there needs to be better mental health services, and that doesn't just mean throw pills their way and be done. We need to help these people, and if they find that nothing else will stop them from wanting to move on, then let them do it peacefully, instead of the more gruesome methods

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s nice to have as an option, but it shouldn’t be a requirement to go through therapy first. The problem is the world is shitty. If people don’t want other people pushing the power button, make the world not shitty. Let’s not always put the burden on the victim to simply learn to accept life.

I think everyone has the right to say, “this is what I want from life. If I cannot have that, then I’m not interested in life.”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, I was just trying to say we should have that option of support where therapy might be beneficial and avoid them passing away. I really don't want someone to suffer in this world being alive, but If I was the person talking to them I'd like to offer helping them, and real help.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, that’s nice of you. But the world is a cruel place to a lot of people, and I think a good chunk of them would power off today if they could.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yes, and back to the main topic MAID should be offered to those who would instead use a more gruesome method....my uncle did that and it shattered our family

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah the “DIY” options are difficult for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

my mom thinks someone else did it. she wont come to terms still.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, out of morbid curiosity, do you think that’s even a remote possibility? You absolutely don’t need to humor me, it’s none of my business.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, it's been proven from the corner it was done by himself with a rope

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is a challenging decision to make.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

yes it is....and a hard pill to swallow

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One step at the time.

Making euthanasia legal for people with terminal illness is already hard enough and I'm glad it is now possible in a lot of countries.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Some of us want out now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There were issues early on and people who shouldn't have been offered the option, got offered the option.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, anyone who wants the option should have the option. The requirement should be to make an appointment.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

No argument against that.

The problem was (as I understand it) the doctor didn't read the room and it was received poorly.