this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
50 points (94.6% liked)

Asklemmy

44148 readers
1305 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
50
When can we expect Executives with robot security? (reddthat.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is a collection of fragmented thoughts brought on by recent events during a long drive. It’s not meant to be “doom and gloom” serious…

Is it correct to expect an uptick in private security firms for executive protection?

Is it correct to assume that some of the ultra rich have their own “private military/force”?

How long until we see executives with some form of robotic security accompanying them?

I can’t tell if we’d expect to see them used in a military capacity first or if the military has too meet redundancy needs first – making it more likely for private ownership first.

I know we’ve seen examples of robodogs on a golf course - but when might an executive be strolling the streets with some form of automated protection?

What might be more realistic near term, or a decade into the future? Hiring soldiers/private-security would still make the most sense?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Different.

You need to constantly bombard a human with propaganda. You cant flip a human around overnight.

A robot can be all good and obedient for its entire existence, then suddenly a small script can turn them to betray the person it's supposed to serve.

If you are able to select a few loyal humans, indoctrinate them from the beginning, and censor them from access to any opposing views, then you are like 99% safe assuming they are professionally trained bodyguards, and you are definitely much safer than with robot bodyguards.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

You don't even need any indoctrination. Just compensate them better than everyone else and they'll give their life for you. That's the power of money.