this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
123 points (90.7% liked)

Asklemmy

44147 readers
1035 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seriously i have zero idea what is going on with bluesky. I never used it. Why are people saying it's centralised? I also heard that a lot of people are joining it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 111 points 2 weeks ago (30 children)

Nothing is wrong with it. Fediverse bros are just salty that it’s getting all the traffic instead of mastodon.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, there are some things wrong with it though?

It's possible to criticize both Mastodon and Bluesky for their respective issues

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The issue is that BlueSky is a for-profit company.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

B-Corp. But as long as they don’t show any kind of sustainable business model compared to their costs, ye the result doesn’t differ much

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It’s possible to criticize both Mastodon and Bluesky for their respective issues

Sure, they're both Twitter-like and hence inherently unsuited to having a discussion for starters.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Mastodon doesn't have low character limits, it's not terrible for having a conversation

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah this is kinda what I've never understood. We have these sorts of, complaints about the demographic movements of these platforms, sure, but their actual core structure is inherently optimized to prey on people's worst instincts, make discussion basically impossible. To prioritize pithy remarks and one-liners over productive conversations, they prioritize public facing ideologues blowing up much smaller individuals. Lemmy's slightly better in that regard, but I feel like we're always somehow descending in quality from what even a basic forum would be capable of.

load more comments (27 replies)