this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
417 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39364 readers
2309 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A YouGov poll revealed that 77% of Germans support banning social media for those under 16, similar to a new Australian law.

The survey found that 82% believe social media harms young people, citing harmful content and addiction.

In Australia, the law fines platforms up to AUD 49.5 million (€30.5M) for allowing under-16s to create accounts, with enforcement trials set before implementation next year. Critics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems that most in Germany do not understand they'll give even more of their online freedom away for no net gain.

Let's mandate state-sanctioned age verification. Some service may accept this, other won't. First loss. Then, some kids will get around that with complacent parents. Other will be pressured into it. In the end, it won't work as a full ban. So, either turn a blind eye to the whole situation (then why bother in the first place), or make it worse: only one account per ID maybe. Big second loss there. And even if it works, it's ignoring that some sites that would qualify as "social media" are the only communication outlet some people have. Third huge loss.

This will only be a terrible annoyance to everyone, prevent some services from growing or even exist, to the benefit of kids using their parents accounts anyway or VPNing around it. They learned how to do that very quickly for other online content.

Laws and rules that are unenforceable at scale are only useful to pin more faults on people when needed, not to help them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So sad that this will cause social media services to decline

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You forgot the /s. "Unexpected end of line error in line 182"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Sorry i don't understand what you are saying, did you mean to close your comment with "/c" to indicate comedy?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oops, sorry, I flubbed it. Oh well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Sarcasm starts with an S unless you are being sarcastic, which is even more funny if you are.

In HTML and stuff, you would write something like:

<s "sarcastic comment that makes everyone laugh" /s>

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Aha....sarcasm in a comment to a sarcastic comment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And so many dipshit billionaires will become common man...Aint it good at least in this way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

I was being sarcastic