this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
1184 points (98.4% liked)

Comic Strips

12980 readers
1893 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1184
New TV (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What does it matter? Unless you’re going back to cable you’ll have to get a “smart” something or other and the “smart” ones always let you pass through the signal anyway so you might as well not deal with all the wires.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

...all what wires? Back to cable? Not sure what you are referring to. I have a single HDMI cable plugged in to a dumb TV from a computer I control. All content comes in through that (with the benefit of things like ad blocking).

Smart TVs have features designed in part to collect data on you and facilitate things like serving you ads. Why would I want that as opposed to a TV without such "features"?

It wouldn't be an issue if the industry still offered dumb TVs, but by and large, they don't (for good reason -- they can profit off of the collected data).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can just not connect it to the internet

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Generally yes, but as that gains popularity, the industry will look elsewhere to get their connection.

The world is bathed in cellular data networks and WiFi. I'd suggest that we aren't that far off from TVs that are connected without your knowledge.

And even if you find that tinfoil-hattish, the key point is: having the hardware in your house to begin with is a security risk. Why must I buy a TV with a camera in it when I literally have no personal use case for a camera in my TV?