this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
303 points (97.8% liked)

PC Gaming

8625 readers
966 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, someone would have. Eventually.

But valve did it early.

It's easy to fill a niche once it's formed. Not so easy to do before, or as it's forming. Or predict if one will form.

I'm not saying valve or Gabe had some kind of foresight or wisdom, I still think it was a gamble. It just happens to be a gamble that worked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

It’s literally the risk taking behaviour to foster innovation that economists supposedly talk about.