this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
1128 points (96.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
73 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    1128
    Linux user (infosec.pub)
    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
    155 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Linus swore that Bitkeeper wouldn't alter the agreement further, like a mad egotistical movie villain.
    Canonical is very clearly funneling their userbase towards a Snap-only environment (something that already exists as an option).
    As the sole keyholders, and as a for-profit business, what is the next step?

    Is it to maintain a wealth of options, even when that cuts into profit margins? What about when those options are competing products (think Gnome and KDE back in the Unity days)?
    These things just do not make sense from a business perspective, and they will not be necessary once their userbase is locked into the Snap walled garden.

    As to your point about licenses and market share, default non-options and limited choices aren't compatible with conversations about choice.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

    How many major distros aren't run by for-profit entities nowadays? If you want any sort of enterprise use, you need to offer a 24/7 live support plan.

    I guess the big difference is that Canonical is hoping to make money off the home users too.