this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
1128 points (96.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
73 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    1128
    Linux user (infosec.pub)
    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I think they get hate because Canonical is a commercial entity.

    [–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I really don't like that sentiment though. Software development isn't for free just because you slap GPL on it. These devs need to be paid somehow if they are supposed to do more than 3h/week.

    You can also see the same thing in the Linux kernel. Many Kernel devs are employed by Microsoft, Google, the NSA and many other commercial entities.

    [–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I love the idea of developers getting paid. Let's do more of that.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

    Total agreement.

    And even if you look at it from an egotistical view point: If the devs are unpaid hobbyists, you get unpaid hobbyist quality.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Free as in "The people who make it should be doing it for free and I still can bitch about them and be the entitled customer as if they were Microsoft"...

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Im all for supporting free software developers, I support UBI