Asklemmy

43891 readers

752 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

When I buy a physical book, am I entitled to scan for myself? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't mean to distribute, but to scan for myself to read digitally, am I allowed to do that legally and ethically when I buy a physical book or would that be totally unethical and illegal?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

You are legally permitted to do so, but not entitled.

What's the difference? DRM.

If you license a digital work, you are allowed to make copies for personal use. However, if the publisher includes features to prevent replication, you are not entitled to make a copy; in other words, publishers including DRM to prevent replication of their works is not illegal because you do not have a right to copy digital works you license, but you are allowed to do so.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago

So basically, they can try to stop you, but you're allowed to win.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

I believe the distinction is you have a right to copy for own use/backup but you don't have the right to break the DRM preventing you from doing so.

For example, you have a right to make a copy of a video game (by installing it to hard drive) but DRM willl prevent you from running it unless you have the original disk in the drive.