Process on an image processed by Gerald - Enhancement of colors
📸 NASA/JPL/SWRI / MSSS / Gerald Eichstädt / Thomas Thomopoulos
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
332 points (99.1% liked)
pics
19606 readers
644 users here now
Rules:
1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer
2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.
3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.
4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.
5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.
Photo of the Week Rule(s):
1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.
2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It’s always so funny to me that the amount of saturation in these images is directly proportional to how long they’ve been doing the rounds on social media.
Directly downloaded from Official Website: https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/Vault/VaultOutput?VaultID=53592&ts=1723603688
It's on the "official website" but it's a "user processed image". Looks like it was a color enhanced version of this original: https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/Vault/VaultOutput?VaultID=53518&ts=1723603688
Which is dumb because the original is already super cool.
Hate to break it to you but from what I can tell this was captured with JunoCam, a visible-light camera. So an "unaltered" version would have familiar colors, and this is already edited.
I mean, aren't most images from orbiters and space telescopes heavily processed before the public ever sees them?
Of course, what they call "camera" might be a high-res spectrometer, plus there may be stacking, tiling, digital optics correction etc. However, the camera did capture a visible-light picture so it has a "natural" interpretation (you can convert it into a "human POV") and this is not that. It probably does not even convey extra information (such as exact wavelengths our cones cannot distinguish) so it's akin to just using a solarization filter on a normal color CMOS camera photo.
Oh didn't know that Thanks.
Oh wow I didn’t realize Jupiter is actually pretty and not just a tan streaky ball
Jupiter definitely had a post-high school glow up.
Looks like a gemstone I'd try to eat.
You know what rocks are delicious? Silica gel.