Open Source

31218 readers

169 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

The Corruption of Open Source (techwontsave.us)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The description mentioned open source ai definition doesnt require data to be open. But https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition explicitly require the data to be open?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

no it doesn't. it only says the weights an information about the training data must be open, not the training data itself. which is honestly useless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Data information == metadata?

(2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.

imo this also includes "the data must be open". The data used for training must be obtainable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that's your interpeetation. what's missing for me is "must be freely (as in not only by specific entities) obtainable". with this wording i could just say: "this data is not obtainable" and be done with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Youre right damn