this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
537 points (95.6% liked)

Open Source

31218 readers
232 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pull request #10974 introduces the @bitwarden/sdk-internal dependency which is needed to build the desktop client. The dependency contains a licence statement which contains the following clause:

You may not use this SDK to develop applications for use with software other than Bitwarden (including non-compatible implementations of Bitwarden) or to develop another SDK.

This violates freedom 0.

It is not possible to build desktop-v2024.10.0 (or, likely, current master) without removing this dependency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Store your database in a nextcloud instance and it's that too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Nope. Since the entire database is contained in a single file, it can't sync multiple edits properly, leading to sync conflicts. Because KeePass was built around local database files, whereas Bitwarden uses actual synced databases, where individual updates can be uploaded, instead of causing conflicts or overwriting the entire db.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Conflicts haven't been an issue for years, all modern iterations of KeePass (XC, kp2a, DX) support automatically merging in the latest before saving.

I've been using it for years this way across several devices, it's incredibly solid

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you sync it across your devices using Syncthing? That's what I'm thinking of doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I keep mine in a self hosted Nextcloud instance, DAV sync is built into the app