this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
305 points (83.5% liked)

Games

32640 readers
846 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"The current obsession with nostalgia and remake culture is easy to understand when you realize that it's a symptom of a culture that isn't allowed to imagine a future."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Retelling stories is such an ancient tradition we literally can trace certain myþs genealogically þrough ð millennia.

Cloud being sad in an Action RPG format ðis time isn't some deep revelation of ð deaþ of creativity because capitalism exists.

And I hate capitalism and what it does to artistic expression!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Do you plan to do all digraphs, or just th?

Will you split out the different vowel phonemes to their IPA?

I'm just intrigued by the thought process behind your choice of typed characters.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ya, like wtf? I got what they were saying based on context clues, but I swear I've been seeing more and more profiles that are trying to do a "thing."

Like this person with the typed characters, I've seen another user in comment threads who posts in the third person and refers to themselves as their fursona (scale-sona?), and of course the trolls.

I guess I just don't get it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

They want to be zany and cool. Nothing more to it.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hæv ė lᵫk yoṙſelf if y'ṙ intcrestid.

Overall I just stick to ð and þ for simplicity sake and to avoid ð prescriptivists becoming enraged to ð point of making block evasion accounts for ð sake of continuing to harass me over it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's certainly simpler, I'll give you that.
It takes too much mental energy to read that document.

May I ask why at all?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'd also like to know why he uses those characters. I'm not the most fluent in English, and never saw those characters used.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

They're old English letters used for writing the two different "th" sounds English has, which are fairly rare phonemes.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

English is one of few languages with such horrific historical spelling problems, and it's basically entirely due to just being too stubborn to write ð words as ðey are pronounced since doing ðat is a signal of "low intellect", as opposed to basically every oðer language ðat does it because of consistent sound shifts making it not as big a deal, or because ð original written language was of deep religious significance making changing it analogous to a kind of blasphemy.

Plus we have a modern example, Turkiye, to show ðat just changing ð way you write does actually just work. Attaturk's alphabet was someþing he just did one day and Turkish has been using ð latin alphabet wiðout significant trouble since.

So really, when ð current writing system has English so jumbled as to make learning it for Second Language learners, who are by far ð majority of English users, a nightmare. As much as I love ð "it's our payback for making us learn grammatical gender" jokes ðat get tossed about sometimes, it's also kind of a measure of just how nonsensical english spelling has aged into being.

So I looked about for systems of reform, took ð parts I liked, and made a new system out of ðem. Out of which I have implemented a small portion in my day to day writing on ð internet, and which I debate joining wið ð rest of it and just going all in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair enough.
Be the change you want to see and all that.

I personally love the mad spelling, but I can understand that other folks don't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What are the capitalists doing to prevent you from expressing artistically?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Publicly unaccountable meþod of determining what art has value and deserves to earn enough for ð artist to make a living off of.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

The value of an art piece is always subjective. The price (closest thing we have to the objective value) is determined by the buyers.

What other mechanism would there be? A committee? That's a bit nazi for my taste. A popular vote? Look at the election results to see why that might be a bad idea.

The theme is a bit touchy these days, especially in certain small country in eastern europe, where the new minister started to cut subsidies to the art she considers unworthy, obscene and politicized, in favor of art reflecting so called traditional values and national identity. The mere existence of the ministry of culture, established with the most noble goal of supporting art, creates this kind of potential vulnerability.