this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
1188 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19127 readers
5748 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Your hypothetical situation regarding abortion is happening as we speak, and the democrats are fighting it. I'm not sure where you've been for the last year.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

In fact it's one of the other major reasons why we need to vote democrat. RvW was overturned because SCOTUS is stacked with republicans. You want to prevent shit like that happening again, you need to vote so we can rebalance the courts.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The democrats have openly refused to pack the courts. How are they supposed to campaign if they don't have Republicans to threaten us with?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

not sure what you're talking about, Biden has appointed almost as many judges as Trump did. And also not far off Obama who served two terms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_United_States_by_judicial_appointments#Judicial_appointments_by_president

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They had two years of majority in both houses under Biden where they could have added justices to the bench.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah obviously moderate dems and DINOs like Manchin are never going to go for that. If that's your bar for voting for democrats you're being completely unrealistic.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Realistically, we're going to have to demand the impossible if we want to solve climate change and half a dozen other major existential issues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Realistically, we’re going to have to demand the impossible

What's impossible is asking humans to work together for the good of all. Enough people think that such behaviour is treason that they will start a violent insurrection to stop it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

and how do you intend to "demand" that? if you mean withholding your vote until they cater to your specific view of the way things should be done you're going to be waiting forever. and in the meantime republicans will keep fucking things up even worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me, personally?

I'm going to help the union movement build a new left because I don't think the Democrat party is worth saving.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and how are you going to vote? that’s the topic of discussion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter, even if I lived in a swing state, this election was decided months ago when Biden dropped out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

excuses excuses. just go vote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol you REALLY don't want to answer the question do you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll be happy to tell you once you explain to me why you think it's important for you to know.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no thanks i know sea lioning when i see it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Nah, you're just being rude and taking offense to being asked to justify your behavior.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The democrats have openly refused to pack the courts. How are they supposed to campaign if they don’t have Republicans to threaten us with?

I used to think these kinds of comments were silly jokes. But, the more that the Dems just allow everything to slip rightwards, it seems like this is really their strategy, and I'm worried it's not a joke.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't worry, when the Republican party falls apart after Trump loses and the Democrats are the pro-fracking, pro-genocide right wing party there will be space for the union movement to assemble a new left coalition.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I hope all this actually happens, as the US would be a better place with serious political representation that isn't different flavours of Conservative. But I won't be surprised if it does not, plenty of people are happy to vote for bigotry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I predicted this back in 2015 when the Democrats started openly conspiring against Bernie. If the 2024 dem incumbent dropped out, not only would Trump lose, but his loss will split the party and the infighting will destroy it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hate fuels Republicans into resisting infighting. They have someone else to hate more.
I worry that it's the left which tends to infight themselves into irrelevance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They do have something to hate more, their own loser selves after they fail to install Trump.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They will blame immigrants, gays, and feminists (especially childless women) first. That's the unifying 'strength' of right-wing politics: ignorant hate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

The "unifying strength" of fascism is it's enforcement of a hierarchy, and Trump's supporters hate losers more than anyone else. When he loses, they are going to blame everyone but especially the "moderate" anti-Trump republicans. They'll destroy their own party trying to root out the unfaithful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

and the democrats are fighting it

Yes, and I worry that they will keep fighting it from a further and further rightwards position, meaning rights are eroded while they position themselves.