this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
419 points (99.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8460 readers
490 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
419
US copyright law 'forces researchers to explore extra-legal methods' for game preservation, say historians who are 'disappointed' after being denied a DMCA exemption (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A collection of humans could form a company for ease of managing and sharing the copyright.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

But then they might try to claim the copyright lasts until the last one dies and then keep swapping in young people to keep it going forever. Pretty much like they do today.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's not how copyright works (at least not in the US). when a corporation creates a copyrighted work (by way of paying the person(s) that actually made it), the duration is set as 120 years after creation or 95 years after publication. The lifetime of any employee is not taken into account. When a copyright is made by a person, it lasts until 70 years after that person dies. You cannot swap out that person for someone else, even if the owner of the copyright changes.

You are probably thinking of a method that is used to make private agreements last basically forever. A private contract technically isn't allowed to last forever, there has to be some point of expiration. To make a contract last forever anyway, they pick some condition that probably won't happen for a ridiculous amount of time, such as when the last descendant of the king of England dies (I assume they use this because the royal family keeps good genealogy records). If a currently living person is required, they might pick some infant relative to make it last as long as possible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

For decades, copyright only increased in length in the U.S., and there’s nothing stopping them from extending it again.

It needs to go the other way, and it needs to be attached to the creative person responsible.

The inclusion of copyright in the constitution is for encouraging creativity. A short monopoly is all that’s needed. Anything more is just greed and does nothing to support more creativity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So if you want the copyright of a work to expire, you need to arrange for the death of the sole copyright holder

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, it should expire at 9 years after the work was made, but to reinforce that, it should be owned by a finite being.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If that one person dies, then there's no one with a stake in enforcing the copyright.

9 years also seems really short. There are sequels that come out far more than 9 years after the original work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Sounds like motivation to get the sequel done sooner.