News

23287 readers

3676 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

He Died Building a Ship for the U.S. Government. His Family Got Nothing. (www.propublica.org)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On the morning of Jan. 22, 2024, Elmer De León Pérez descended deep into the bowels of a ship that he was helping to build in Houma, Louisiana. Pérez was a welder, working to construct one of the U.S. government’s most sophisticated ships, an $89 million vessel for tracking hurricanes and conducting oceanographic research. It was funded by President Joe Biden’s signature climate legislation.

When emergency workers found his body, Pérez was already showing signs of rigor mortis. A coroner’s report would note that he was wearing a red hoodie, plaid pajama pants and brown steel-toed boots, and that a “copious amount of clear fluid was noted to the mouth and nose,” as well as on the sleeve of his shirt. The coroner concluded that Pérez “died as a result of bilateral severe pulmonary consolidation and edema” — fluid in the lungs — and “copper and nickel intoxication.” (The ship, like many, used copper-nickel alloys as a coating because they resist corrosion from salt water.)

But Pérez wasn’t working directly for Thoma-Sea; he was employed by a contractor. So when he died, Thoma-Sea paid nothing. Not to his family, including the partner that survived him. Not to his toddler son. Not even to help send Pérez’s body home to Guatemala. Instead, his family borrowed money and desperately tried to raise the rest online. Family members said they haven’t heard anything from Thoma-Sea since Pérez died.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

When Pérez’s partner sought death benefits from G-4 Services, the local staffing contractor that had hired him to work for Thoma-Sea, G-4 rebuffed her. “Pérez was a self-employed independent contractor and thus a claim for death benefits is not compensable,” a lawyer for the company wrote in May. G-4 contends that Pérez “wasn’t working at the time of his death” even though his corpse was found in the ship with his welding equipment.
[...]
Employers with federal contracts are supposed to ascertain workers’ eligibility — and ensure subcontractors do the same — using the government’s online E-Verify system, which checks identity information like Social Security numbers against federal databases. But experts say E-Verify makes it easy for workers to provide false information, and government agencies rarely monitor compliance with these rules.
[...]
G-4 is disputing the benefits claim, citing Peréz’s ineligibility as an independent contractor, saying his partner was ineligible because they were not legally married, and claiming the sudden death of a healthy 20-year-old was not caused by his job. His death, a medical review conducted at the request of G-4 argued, “occurred while he was working but was not caused by workplace related factors or activities.”

So the problem here is a shady subcontractor company which hires undocumented immigrants as "independent contractors", and probably doesn't keep track of whether those workers are working on federal contracts or not, and they're not being audited. These workers are probably uninsurable without valid documentation, so the company will do whatever it can to avoid having to pay out any benefits because they can't actually carry legitimate insurance.

The solutions are:

Increase the oversight on such companies and enforce rules about identity verification.
Close the "independent contractor" loophole, forcing all workers to be fully documented and insured through their companies.

*Edit - further thought on this particular situation:

The contractor (Thomas-Sea) violated the contract term which requires the contractor to verify that workers working on the federal contract are eligible (legally documented). Therefore, the contractor has produced a sub-standard product (the ship) which does not meet the terms of the contract. One must wonder which other requirements they have ignored or intentionally violated.

The federal government should refuse to accept completion of the contract/pay for the ship until the issue is resolved. The resolution should be that all workers who have worked on the contract must be legally documented - therefore the contractor should be required to arrange retroactive work visas for any workers attached to the contract who might need them, with no penalization of the workers themselves for not having visas. The contractor should pay to have this process expedited. The family of the dead man should be compensated for the contractor's failure to ensure safe working conditions (again as a term for accepting completion of the contract). The contractor is responsible for the behavior of their subcontractor, so if Thomas-Sea wants to sue G-4 Services for the cost of the above, then that's perfectly fine.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Also make it easier for undocumented immigrants to receive temporary work visas. That essentially fixes the independent contractor loophole especially when it comes to government contracts

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh yes, this is a good point, make the work visas more available, then everything can be properly documented.

Another idea would be requiring independent contractors to carry their own insurance and provide documentation for it in order to be employed by a company. That way they have life and health benefit coverage, and we don't necessarily have to get rid of the independent contractor category for this type of work.

Then we just have to push the companies to pay higher wages in order to cover the workers' extra cost... which could be done by increasing minimum wage for all work.