Science Memes

10923 readers

1983 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

710

Honey (mander.xyz)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

520 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are just assuming it would never grow big enough to affect the line.

i have made no such assumption. teh fact is that it has not, in fact, reduced suffering (if we regard all animal slaughter as suffering, and the most meaningful metric). to continue to claim that it will is just a hypothesis, and continues to be unsupported by the facts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My problem is that it could be working now but since theres no proof yet you won't believe it. What if that line starts very slowly flattening out? Is that enough evidence?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What if that line starts very slowly flattening out? Is that enough evidence?

you'd have to show the causal link between vegans existing and the production flattening. what if it's just that we run out of agricultural land, or a meteor strikes a major production region? we need to know what actually causes the change in the graph, not simply speculate that it could be buying beans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

If we ran out of new land to use wouldnt it plateau?

Isnt the line going up constantly evidence of constant addition of new land to hold more animals?

I suppose they could be getting more efficient but thats the opposite of regulation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I suppose they could be getting more efficient but thats the opposite of regulation.

whatever you call it, we can't attribute it to vegans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Isnt the line going up constantly evidence of constant addition of new land to hold more animals?

I'm assuming it is this in combination with new efficiencies (like the swine hotels in China)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ew, thanks for something new to look up, I hate it!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If we ran out of new land to use wouldnt it plateau?

that's the assumption I'm using.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When we run out of land, won't we have to replace land used for meat production for land for plant production so we can continue feeding an expanding world?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean I don't know: these are some pretty wild hypotheticals we are concocting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I didnt know you'd think it was so wild. I guess we have plenty of land left tk go around for a while?