this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
135 points (97.2% liked)

Creepy Wikipedia

3937 readers
18 users here now

A fediverse community for curating Wikipedia articles that are oddly fascinating, eerily unsettling, or make you shiver with fear and disgust

image

Guidelines:
  1. Follow the Code of Conduct

  2. Do NOT report posts YOU don't consider creepy

  3. Strictly Wikipedia submissions only

  4. Please follow the post naming convention: Wikipedia Article Title - Short Synopsis

  5. Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails.

  6. Please refrain from any offensive language/profanities in the posts titles, unless necessary (e.g. it's in the original article's title).

Mandatory:

If you didn't find an article "creepy," you must announce it in the thread so everyone will know that you didn't find it creepy

image

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They're still trying to clear their names. More frustrating than creepy, but deserving of a read.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I just like to present it since like a lot of the conversation revolves around, and I think most people, myself included, had their first exposure to the case through, Paradise Lost which is fr only one angle ya know?

Idk if I would've convicted them. I think there was a lot of stuff that wasn't clear on either side which isn't beyond a reasonable doubt

But I've also been on a couple juries and always voted not guilty so maybe that's a personal thing lol

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

I would maybe add that bit. Because to me your post seemed like you were supporting their conviction, not just presenting facts.