this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
338 points (99.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43881 readers
916 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me, it was that the Internet never forgets and that you should never enter your real name. In my opinion, both of these rules are now completely ignored.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

twitter built itself on doing this the most nonsensical and annoying way possible.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I’ve never used Twitter and every time I see a post with like… the original comment in the middle, a reply on top, and a reply again? On bottom? I’m like what the fuck is even how

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Especially with quote retweets that are screenshots of threads with the quote retweets itself having a thread.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Gmail is super annoying at this, there is no way to automatically turn this off. I just have to delete the ellipsis every damn time

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I like to think I'm reasonably intelligent but whatever the heck Gmail does with its reply "conversation" order absolutely bamboozles me. It decides to just hide messages in the middle seemingly at random too, and gives them all reply buttons.

Agh!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I think it's fine for email, better even. Unless there's a list of questions or something. In forums and lemmy I don't see it at all.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Breaking the rules to demonstrate how this looks dumb

Don't top post.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exception: when the quoted thing is the punchline

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The thing that grinds my gears

WARNING: I’m not actually a quotation tho my > character says that is what I am for in the specification & if you check my HTML markup I am a <blockquote> which also has a spec saying I must quote a source

Markdown-itis is ruining semantics on the web just ’cause it doesn’t support callouts like a proper lightweight markup syntax for documentation, technical writing, & blogging. It is the wrong tool for these mediums but users forgo caring about semantics for the familar not even understand their tools or their outputs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

.. except when it's a forwarded convo and then it's okay, as per 1855.

And then when is a conversation NOT a comment or update to something you've forwarded back? The answer is never.

So it's all good.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The same people who carelessly hit "reply all", I imagine. Lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Came here to say that. It actually predates common internet usage - Fidonet was a much bigger thing through the 80s and early 90s than emails, and BBS forums used it to distribute messages.

Properly quote only what you are replying to. Quote a line, reply to it. Repeat on multiple points.

Then wait a few days for a reply, of course, unless they were dialling into the same BBS.

Now we have boards like this that do a pretty good job about displaying context and quoting is less needed.