this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
58 points (93.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43851 readers
866 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it's actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that's really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

After an entity reaches an annual cap (say $5m profit), 95c of every dollar should be taxed

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Give em a "you won capitalism!" Participation trophy πŸ† too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And a hearty handshake and a high five. Then start selling their assets and departments to competitors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Make that 100c. Fuck them. Nobody needs that much money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gonna need tons of capitals controls to prevent money from leaving, rich people are good at moving. To what end? So the federal government gets even more money to spend on subsidies, police riot gear & highways. They'd turn the Pentagon into an octagon before they'd meaningfully help their citizens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it’s not the only thing that would need to change for sure… I didn’t want to get too crazy here 😝

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If other nations can have billionaires and we can't, and our country is vast and rich, we will be at a disadvantage.

The WANT of money is corrupting itself. Actually having the money itself is not needed. People who want money will destroy your little system, and throw your country into chaos, ruination and poverty, united by a conspiracy of common interests.

I would rather just regulate what needs regulating, within reason, with a gentle hand, and only a strong hand with the worst of violations. For the record, I would be much harsher than the us has tended to be when it comes to pollution, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No. Fuck them. They can leave.

They will still do business in your country.

Also countries should tax companies on money that goes out of the country based off of their overall profit. So if Google makes 10% profit over costs the. We charge them 30% tax on the money they funneled out of Australia. Done.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fair enough..

I don’t think you can truely regulate any system we currently know in favour of the populace. So I take the us Vs them approach.

Each to their own 😎

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would like 95% of your dollars, please. If we get to arbitrarily rob people who make more than we do, I'd like something from you!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Lol.. keep growing