this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
305 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17209 readers
5 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

10,000 was actually a fabrication. Benefits are greatest around 8700 steps.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

And it also was never all or nothing. I keep my goal at 6000 just because 10k (i didn't know about 8700) isn't realistic for me. It's still better than what I would walk normally.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Basically the benifits of walking (on lowering all-cause mortality) sort of plateau at 8700...

10k still isn't a bad metric to strive for.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't be intimidated though. If you're not regularly exercising, start with a smaller goal And increase at a rate you're comfortable with. Walking is a great activity and is great for your body and easier on your knees than running.

The point is to do more than you are now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What I appreciate about my Garmin is that it adjusts my step goals up and down to make them achievable. Miss my goal for the day? The next day is a few steps less. Hit my goal? The next is a few steps more. I get the satisfaction of reaching goals, but don't feel bad about myself if I miss.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I had no idea this was a thing, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It sounds like whoever said 10k rounded up. Doesn’t seem unreasonable imo.