this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
634 points (98.6% liked)

World News

38824 readers
1689 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has gained ground in three recent state elections, caused an uproar in the Thuringian parliament and triggering another debate on whether to ban the party outright.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Some of us are convinced this measure does nothing

Nothing? How can it do nothing? You could argue that it doesn't do enough or not the right things, but if nothing else banning the party would obviously keep them out of the government at least for the next few years.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I dont know, you'd have to ask someone who believes that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How can it do nothing?

If you pass a law but never enforce it, the law does nothing. That's assuming the Parliament could even pass it in a government that's thick with AfD MPs.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That rather speaks for banning the AfD though. We have a law for banning fascist parties, so we should enforce it, or it truly would mean nothing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That rather speaks for banning the AfD though.

Belling the Cat.

We have a law for banning fascist parties

You have laws for banning use of symbols of unconstitutional and terrorist organizations. These have been deployed most aggressively against Communists, Socialists, Islamists, and - post USSR - against Russian Nationalists. Currently, it is pro-Palestinian Jews who suffer the most from application of these laws.

The AfD is that its being fueled by a ton of right-wing media. It isn't just a party springing from the soil ex nihilio. It is a consequence of right wing press flooding German society. And as the press builds support for the AfD, the AfD helps shield these press organs from censorship by the state. Its a self-replicating trend.

Can you ban a party that's got a plurality of seats in the Parliament? Or will they be the ones banning you?

I mean, by all means, feel free to give it a shot. But it seems like you're asking an elected government to do a thing it isn't designed to do. MPs aren't going to vote against themselves.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Can you ban a party that's got a plurality of seats in the Parliament? Or will they be the ones banning you?

Of course. And it's nonsensical to claim we cannot ban them, while worrying they could ban us. We can and we should, based on what you yourself wrote:

If you pass a law but never enforce it, the law does nothing.

We have laws against undemocratic parties, so we should enforce them.

I mean, by all means, feel free to give it a shot. But it seems like you're asking an elected government to do a thing it isn't designed to do.

But it is designed to do exactly that. That's like a core mechanism of our democracy.

The only way to argue we shouldn't ban the AFD is if you claim that they somehow should be exempt from our mechanisms against fascism. They were enforced before, they will be enforced again. And the AFD fits the bill in every way.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And it’s nonsensical to claim we cannot ban them

Who is going to pull the trigger? Point to the opposition leader willing and able to try and dismantle a party with this many active supporters.

We have laws against undemocratic parties

Which are used to target unpopular fringe groups not regional majorities. The UK would have more luck banning the SNP.

That’s like a core mechanism of our democracy.

The core mechanism of democracy is to abolish political organizations wholesale?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who is going to pull the trigger? Point to the opposition leader willing and able to try and dismantle a party with this many active supporters.

Read the article. It's already happening.

Which are used to target unpopular fringe groups not regional majorities.

You don't seem to know a lot about the German constitution. The opposite is true. Unppular fringe groups are not banned because they are not actually a danger to democracy, as long as government positions are not in reach for them. That's exactly how the german federal constitutional court has argued in the past. Successful bans ever only targeted actually successful parties.

The core mechanism of democracy is to abolish political organizations wholesale?

The core mechanism of democracy is to protect itself, and first and foremost that means protecting itself from facism. A political organisation that's threatening democracy should obviously not be allowed, so it will be banned.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago

Read the article. It’s already happening.

Place your bets. Place your bets.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Which are used to target unpopular fringe groups not regional majorities.

Oh, okay, they're too popular to do anything about. Phew. For a moment there I thought there might have been a consistent opposition to fascism.