this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
633 points (87.5% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2560 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There is a vote for MORE or LESS of all of the above. It's not like your vote doesn't matter. Do you want more genocide, or less genocide? "No genocide" isn't an option. So do you want more genocide, or less genocide?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

OK I want LESS.

I have been wanting less for a long time. Those things I want LESS of don't seem to be reduced by much since I became eligible to vote. Voting's not enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Awesome, vote Democrat.

Voting’s not enough.

Almost correct. There's just not enough voting. Having a razor thin Democrat majority doesn't net us any victories, it just prevents (most) catastrophe. You want progress, give us a 5-senator majority (enough to override the Manchins and Sinemas). You want major progress, give us 60 dems, to bypass the filiburster. Though, Democrats finally seem willing to end the filibuster rule, so at least we should see some progress on that front.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which is which? Like, seriously. Put the recent headlines about Israel's actions against the other guy's vague, contradictory statements and demonstrated lack of deep interest in foreign affairs. It's not clear at all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Put the recent headlines about Israel’s actions against the other guy’s vague, contradictory statements and demonstrated lack of deep interest in foreign affairs.

You're comparing Netanyahu to Trump? I don't understand.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For what it's worth, I'm comparing what's actually happening (genocide and the Middle East spiraling into war) with Democrats in office (tsk-tsking but providing material support to Netanyahu) to what history shows would likely happen with the other guy in office (hot air and bombast, but almost certainly not any greater material support).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You know Trump has called for the extermination of all Palestinians, right? If you think Trump will be soft on Palestinians...well, you don't. You're lying. If you're saying Trump would (or even might) be easier on Palestinians than Biden or Harris, you're just straight up lying. There's no possible way to be ignorant enough to make an honest mistake there. It's a lie, and probably propaganda, because why else would you say it?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

More directly relevant, many members of Netanyahu's government have also called for the extermination of all Palestinians, and they have the U.S. government providing political cover while they do it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In-progress vs. potential? I dunno, seems pretty self-evident to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

But we're not voting for Netanyahu.