this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
84 points (74.7% liked)

World News

32219 readers
573 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Are you saying that using nukes against civilian populations was equivalent to conventional bombing because of "the damage"? What point are you trying to make here?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The point is that Nagasaki and Hiroshima weren't exceptional, but rather typical of US bombing strategies against civilian populations that the US has continued to use into the modern day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I would say that by the very nature of it being nukes it was exceptional. Like, the very definition of exceptional. Yes, the USA often bombs instead of negotiating, that is not exceptional.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The fire bombing of civilians were terrible and shouldn't be forgotten in the shade of the mushroom cloud.