this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
30 points (75.9% liked)
World News
32317 readers
621 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not to say they didn't fail but they were in an impossible situation given an impossible task with an opponent that was never interested in negotiating in good faith.
There's more than enough blame to go around on the failure of negotiations, depending on who you believe. For example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Camp_David_Summit
Sorry for the r*ddit link but here's a map of the camp David offer:
https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/174j2vb/camp_david_peace_plan_proposal_2000/?depth=30
Clinton threw a hissy fit at Arafat because he didn't get this feather in his cap for his legacy. There has never been a serious offer from Israel.
Here's a later one:
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fcamp-david-summit-2000-israeli-palestinian-peace-proposal-v0-bf0sjyatcel81.jpg%3Fs%3D12050f876bf8f3c65ff49c0e5fa3cbe81f6070df
Point being that, depending on who you ask, Arafat decided to stop negotiating. Something Prince Bandar labelled criminal.
Rightly or wrongly, many Israelis seem to have come to the conclusion that any proposal would never be enough. Maybe the Palestinians could have gotten more out of it, it was clear that the Israeli PM was desperate to sign a deal, because he knew his future was riding on it. Arafat gained in popularity for taking a hard line. Israeli PM Barak predictably lost popularity and the election, because many Israelis thought he had gone too far.