this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
308 points (97.8% liked)
Gaming
20169 readers
284 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Interesting it's a patent lawsuit and not copyright. I haven't played Palworld and barely know how Pokemon works; is the gameplay in any way similar?
They'd have very little chance in a copyright suit and they know it. Because you can't copyright game mechanics or general concepts, and those are the things Palworld pretty obviously copies.
You capture monsters in balls, hurting them more makes it easier.
Except for the capture mechanic working similar, which hopefully was not just copy-pasted, the gameplay is completely different. Palworld plays like Arc x Fortnite, while Pokémon plays like Final Fantasy.
And the general design-inspiration itself shouldn’t be an issue. Because I don’t think "style" can be copyrighted
I know that's how it works in the US, but the lawsuit is in Japan, which you always hear about having stricter copyright laws. Not really sure how this one will play out though.
Yeah but again, not a copyright lawsuit.