politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
...and so the GOP decided to show their disdain for reproductive rights.
Fuck anyone who complains about the “Democrats not getting anything done” when these literal obstructionist GOP politicians have blocked any progress. Absolutely need a complete Blue wave for President, House, and Senate to get actual progress done.
Withholding Medicaid funding doesn't seem like a great idea. But on the whole being against banning IVF seems like a good idea. Am I missing something?
Republicans don't want to secure IVF and don't want to pay for Medicaid. GOP state's would happily block IVF to get Medicaid defunded.
they want to turn their states into shitholes, and a few have succeeded in that. I'm all for the brain drain that'll happen. especially if those funds got diverted to blue states.
I'm aware of their issues with reproduction e rights. But that's not what that statement says.
I read the OP again. I read your statement again. I'm not seeing a different meaning than the one I came away with and commented on originally.
What are you saying the statement says that my comments contradict?
The statement said withhold Medicaid for states banning IVF. Aka if you ban IVF, the bill would punish the state by withholding Medicaid. Seems to be the opposite of what Republicans want with IVF.
I see your confusion: (many) Republicans want to ban IVF.
Look at the title of this post we're in. "Republicans block Senate Democrats’ IVF bill". That bill protects IVF, and the republicans shot it down.
Look at Republican run states and compare to demographics. You might see a correlation.