Science

13259 readers

31 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-12

Scientist concludes: "We don't have free will" (www.latimes.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So basically what Sam Harris said back in 2012?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Scientist concludes highly philosophical discussion years and years after it's already been discussed in depth and studied at length.

But they're a scientist! That means it's news.

And Jesus Christ.

This means accepting that a man who shoots into a crowd has no more control over his fate than the victims who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. It means treating drunk drivers who barrel into pedestrians just like drivers who suffer a sudden heart attack and veer out of their lane.

Is this written by someone in high school?