this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
616 points (98.4% liked)

News

23284 readers
3407 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

GOP lawmakers and analysts virtually unanimous that Trump was second best to Harris in first presidential debate

Donald Trump’s campaign was in damage control mode on Wednesday amid widespread dismay among supporters over a presidential debate performance that saw Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent, repeatedly goad him into going wildly off-message and missing apparent opportunities to tackle her on policy.

Even with Trump insisting to have won the debate “by a lot”, Republicans were virtually unanimous that Trump had come off second best in a series of exchanges that saw the vice-president deliberately bait him on his weak points while he responded with visible anger.

The Republican nominee – who took the unusual step afterwards of visiting the media spin room, a venue normally frequented only by candidates’ surrogates – was non-committal on Wednesday to the Harris campaign’s proposal for a second debate. Despite widespread opinion to the contrary, Trump suggested she needed it because she had lost. “I’d be less inclined to because we had a great night. We won the debate,” he told Fox & Friends.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

... you all over the place, buddy. Nearly incomprehensible. Did you have anything of substance to add?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Read slower, if you can decipher Donnie's ramblings you shouldn't have any problems.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Who said I can? Yours is incoherent and disjointed. Reading slower doesn't help.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah it's a comprehension issue, that explains so much.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

IT IS A COMPREHENSION ISSUE BECAUSE WHAT YOU WROTE IS INCOMPREHENSIBLE.

I'm just about done... yall are wearing me out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Luckily for you I worked in special education in a former life so I have some experience with this:

Donald Trump should’ve just said the plan (that he claims to have) then. (Stop me if you need clarification)

He could've shown us some plan in 2016 (still waiting on that healthcare plan) (Stop me if you need clarification)

He could've shown us some plan in 2020 before he lost the election and attempted to overthrow the legitimately elected government of the U.S. (Stop me if you need clarification)

The reality is that he doesn't have a plan. (Stop me if you need clarification)

He understands what a plan is so he can say "I have a concept of a plan" and think he's being clever, but again, he doesn't actually have a plan. (Stop me if you need clarification)

His cult of followers will do an incredible amount of mental somersaults to hear whatever meaning they want to hear in his words, because it's a cult of personality. (Stop me if you need clarification)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Let me stop you for clarification. Is your attitude this reprehensible and insufferable in real life? Or just online?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is me being nice to you.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I didn't comment about you being nice or not. I commented about how utterly insufferable you seem to be. The reading comprehension is very low here...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'M GOING TO EAT YOUR PETS.

edit: I love how you've used "comprehension" twice after I used it, did you learn a new word today?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

... I used comprehension in direct response to your use of comprehension.

I'm about to just stop responding to everyone. I feel this is a losing battle...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I’m about to just stop responding to everyone.

Yes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Weren't you complaining and ad hominem earlier?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pointing them out is one thing. Complaining about them is another. And no, I wasn't complaining about them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cool. Now how about you comment on the rest of the post that was very gently laying things out so that it would not be "incomprehensible"?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's for the invite, but no thanks. Don't even know what comment you're referring to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Of course not, that would require you actually having a coherent point to try to defend.

I was referring to this comment by the way if you want to take a stab at actually trying to say something worthwhile: https://lemmy.ca/comment/11599323